bring your real self to church this Easter

An Easter message from Bishop Stephen T. Lane

[vodpod id=Video.3357718&w=425&h=350&fv=]

more about “bring your real self to church this E…“, posted with vodpod

bring your real life to church on Easter

When the women went to the tomb on Easter Day they found that the body of their beloved rabbi was gone. Jesus was missing. That “missingness” adds special poignancy to the Easter readings. When Jesus later appeared to his disciples, he appeared in his body. They recognized him, and he showed them the wounds of his crucifixion.

There’s something about bodies and resurrection that goes together. God does not seem willing to let go of the body in the midst of resurrection. That’s a little uncomfortable for us. I think it would be easier if we could just spiritualize the resurrection or theologize the resurrection. But God wants to keep it real. God has not rejected the form he took on when Jesus was born among us. God is still with us and in our real bodies and real lives.

So much of the suffering in the world has to do with our bodies, whether it’s earthquake victims in Haiti or residents in nursing homes, people in prison or in hospital, refugees and victims of war. So much of the pain and suffering we endure is because of our bodies. There is something about the resurrection that means to lift our whole lives to God.

This Sunday when you go to church, bring your real life. Bring the things that trouble you and worry you and give you pain. Let Christ lift you and your real life.

Alleluia. Christ is risen.

Final thoughts on the House of Bishops meeting

Tuesday was a glorious day in Texas – sunny, warm; what those of us from the Northeast had been hoping for.

On Tuesday morning we continued our discussion of Emergence Christianity with a panel discussion involving all our presenters. It was a wide-ranging conversation covering both the practical, financial issues of engaging young adults and the theological issues related to non-hierarchical, non-doctrinal communities.

Tuesday afternoon we got another short break, enough time for a long walk in the sunshine.

Tuesday evening Bishop Rickel of Olympia made a brief report about Mission Funding. Greg was representing a strategy group previously appointed by the Presiding Bishop. That was followed by a detailed report from Kathy Grieb of Virginia Theological Seminary on the Anglican Covenant. Professor Grieb is a member of the Anglican Communion Covenant Committee. Her report covered the changes in the Covenant since the Ridley Draft, particularly in relation to Section IV. There were many questions from the Bishops. The Covenant has now been presented to the Provinces for their consideration.

On Wednesday, the House met for its business meeting. We cast ballots for the election of a Bishop Suffragan for Federal Chaplaincies and a Bishop Diocesan for Navajoland. We heard a report on the diocesan canons needed for the implementation of the new Title IV by July 2011. And we continued our conversations about the Anglican Covenant and the theology paper on Same Gender Relationships. Our meeting ended with a service of Holy Eucharist, including Renewal of Vows, and a moving sermon by Dean Wolfe, Bishop of Kansas. We concluded our time at Camp Allen with a festive dinner.

Although I’ve only been a bishop for a couple of years, it seemed to me that this was a very good meeting of the House of Bishops. The Planning Committee scheduled our time so most of it was spent in theological conversation. The bishops had asked for such a focus, and the Planning Committee delivered. There was a great deal of input from a variety of learned presenters, followed by fairly intense conversation, both in table groups and in plenary. I heard a number of bishops express satisfaction about the design of the meeting.

As usual worship and Bible study were an important part of the our time. The music was wonderful, and the Bishops’ Choir was strengthened by several new members. We have new chaplains who are getting used to us – and we to them – so things often felt quite different than we were used to. But both chaplains showed themselves to be fine preachers. And I think it was important to get things from perspectives outside the The Episcopal Church and beyond the continental U.S.

There were a number of new bishops present. The Class of 2010 has eleven new bishops. As is our practice, newly elected bishops who have not yet been consecrated were present with seat and voice. It was good to meet them and to hear from them in our discussions.

The report from the House of Bishops’ Theology Committee received mixed reviews. There was generally positive response to the clarity of the traditionalist paper (with some significant criticism for some of the terms used in the paper) and appreciation for the new and positive approach taken by the expansionist paper. At the same time, there was a sense among some that the report as a whole seemed like a rehash of long standing arguments. The mutual respect expressed by the two groups of theologians, and their willingness to address one another’s concern offered hope of continuing dialogue. The papers will be reviewed by other Anglican and ecumenical theologians before everything is published together.

For myself, I wished that the discussion of marriage and family life had taken into account the fact that marriage has undergone many changes over the centuries – it has not always been about the nuclear family – and that biological procreation is not the only way families are created. Marriage is truly a form of Christian community, and such households/communities are the places where we learn much of what it means to be Christian people.

The discussion of the Anglican Covenant left many bishops feeling vaguely underwhelmed. For some the changes to Section IV seemed an invitation for The Episcopal Church to participate and to have a voice at the table where our concerns might be addressed. For others Section IV remained problematic and a way to move some churches to a second track of the Anglican Communion. Interestingly, the Covenant will be operative only for those Provinces that endorse it, but the Covenant states clearly that only those who sign it may represent the Anglican Communion ecumenically. It makes one wonder what will happen if the English Church doesn’t sign on.

Again, for myself, I remain unconvinced that a Covenant is necessary. Although this final draft is vastly improved over the initial draft, to say nothing of the Appendix in the Windsor Report, it still moves us more in the direction of a confessing church than I think is helpful.

The House of Bishops meets next in September in Phoenix.


Bishop Steve reports from the House of Bishops meeting in Texas

I’m spending the week at the spring meeting of the House of Bishops at Camp Allen near Navasota, Texas. The spring meeting is the longer of our two yearly meetings and usually includes some elements of a retreat. Our focus for this retreat has been on the Identity of the Episcopal Church, and we’ve been looking at that issue in a couple of different ways.

We arrived here Thursday afternoon and Friday morning, and began our work Friday afternoon with the Walkabout for the Bishop for Federal Chaplaincies. Bp. George Packard is retiring soon, and the House of Bishops is charged with electing his successor.

There are eight candidates, and as a group, it’s a strong field. We heard short statements for all eight and, then, over the afternoon and evening, we interviewed them in groups of four. The eight then offered concluding statements. Although several candidates stood out for me, it will probably take several ballots to elect the bishop.

On Saturday morning, we spent a couple hours discussing and asking questions about the report of the House of Bishops Theology Committee on Same Gender Relationships. The report focuses on the third section of the Nicene Creed on the Holy Spirit and on the sacrament of marriage. The report consists of a pair of papers and criticism by two affinity groups of theologians who identified themselves traditionalist and expansionist. The work is interesting and commendable for its clarity. Discussion is continuing.

On Saturday afternoon, we engaged two aspects of Around One Table, and spent a couple of hours discussing “Incarnation” and “Source of Salvation.” Around One Table is part of the Episcopal Identify Project undertaken by the College for Bishops and CREDO. It’s purpose is to learn more about how Episcopalians understand themselves and their church. The themes we discussed were two which ordained persons see as considerably more important to our identity than lay people do.

Saturday evening and Sunday was sabbath time. Many bishops took full advantage of the quiet with walks and reading or various kinds of activities – golf, horseback riding, canoeing, etc. The only scheduled activity was worship. The service was quite wonderful, with lovely music by the choir and preaching by one of our new chaplains. The House of Bishops has two new chaplains, a Lutheran pastor and a priest from the Dominican Republic. Our chaplains lead daily prayer and worship and are available for private consultation. The new chaplains remind us of the expanding context of our ministry as The Episcopal Church.

Sunday evening we had a fireside chat with the Presiding Bishop. This is an opportunity for brief input from Katharine and then wide-ranging questions from the bishops. Bishop Duracin of Haiti was present, and he spoke movingly of the aftermath of the earthquake and his gratitude for The Episcopal Church’s support for his diocese and his family. Mme. Duracin is recovering in Florida from her severe leg injury. Haiti, of course, continues to struggle with the basics of food, clothing and shelter. A plan for rebuilding is in the early stages of development. Actual rebuilding is still a ways off.

The bishops’ questions were very wide ranging and addressed such subjects as the Daughters of the King, the timing of the consent process for the election of a bishop, the impact of the election of Mary Glasspool as Bishop Suffragan for Los Angeles, continuing to find room in our church for faithful persons with differing beliefs related to human sexuality, continuing to focus on theological discourse as part of our meetings as bishops, investigating new models for episcopal ministry in small dioceses, and the working relationship between bishops and our lay and ordained partners in CCABs.

On Monday we began two days of work on Emergence Christianity. In the morning we heard a lecture by Phylis Tickle, author of The Great Emergence, and in the afternoon, a lecture by Diana Butler Bass, historian and author. The lectures were followed by three workshops focusing on different aspects of emergence. I attended a workshop by Tom Brackett, Congregational Developer from the Church Center, and Stephanie Spellers of The Crossing Community in Boston, on ways to encourage and support the development of emergent congregations in our dioceses. We in Maine have already begun such work at the Cathedral, but it’s clear that our work will need continuing exploration and development if it is to be successful.

We continue our conversations on Emergence Christianity tomorrow. Our business meeting is Wednesday. On Thursday, I’ll travel home to Maine.


Statement by Bishop Stephen T. Lane on Marriage Equality

On Thursday, October 1, I delivered this statement during a press conference sponsored by the Religious Coalition for the Freedom to Marry in Maine held at Emmanuel Baptist Church in Portland. The coalition represents individual clergy and members of 18 denominations and groups, and I was joined by five other speakers: two United Methodist leaders, a conservative Rabbi, a United Church of Christ minister, and a lay representative from Catholics for Marriage Equality. More than 25 Maine clergy joined us at the podium including several priests in the Diocese of Maine. Dean Ben Shambaugh of St. Luke’s Cathedral fielded a question on Scripture and marriage equality. Video of his answer may be watched beneath my statement below.

Bishop Steve delivers his statement
Bishop Steve delivers his statement
Statement by the Rt. Rev. Stephen T. Lane
Episcopal Bishop of Maine

October 1, 2009

My name is Stephen Lane, and I am the Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Maine. Today, as a member of the Religious Coalition for the Freedom to Marry in Maine, I join my brothers and sisters – tens of thousands of Mainers from all over of our state – in supporting the No on 1 campaign. In the past Mainers of every creed and stripe have said proudly and faithfully that “Maine Won’t Discriminate,” and it is time to say it again, clearly and without equivocation.

The Episcopal Church – through its principle legislative body, the General Convention, representing 110 dioceses in 14 countries around the world – has a long history of publicly proclaiming and defending the civil rights of all people. Since 1976, we have specifically and repeatedly held that gay and lesbian persons are entitled to equal protection under the law. It is my belief that the right to marry is a crucial civil right, establishing both protections and obligations that safeguard gay and lesbian couples and their families.

It is core to our Christian belief that we are all children of God, created in God’s image, and, in baptism, we are all full members of the church. In the Episcopal Church, we have also determined that sexual orientation, in and of itself, is no bar to holding any office or ministry in the church, as long as the particular requirements of that office or ministry are met. In many of our congregations, both here in Maine and around the country, faithful same-gender couples and their families are sharing in their local church’s life and ministry and in service to their communities. As full members of our churches and contributing citizens of Maine, these families are as entitled to the rights and responsibilities of civil marriage as any couple.

I believe that faithful, lifelong monogamous relationships are among the building blocks of a healthy and stable society. With the passage of L.D. 1020 last spring, the rights and obligations of civil marriage were extended to all Maine citizens. The passage of Question 1 would deny those rights to certain persons on the basis of sexual orientation, and it would create two classes of citizens and deny one group what we believe is best for them and for society. Domestic partnerships, which Maine allows, and civil unions, which it does not, are not – when measured by the way they are regarded by society or by the legal and financial benefits they bestow – the same as civil marriage.

Although we are not of one mind regarding same gender marriage in The Episcopal Church, we continue to search for ways to honor the varied viewpoints on this issue and to provide a place of dignity and respect for each of them. Therefore, I affirm the portion of the law – passed by both houses of our legislature and signed by Governor Baldacci – that affirms that there will be no effort to compel or coerce any minister to act in a way contrary to his or her belief and conscience. There will certainly never be any requirement in the Episcopal Diocese of Maine to act in contravention of conscience or of church doctrine.

In July the Episcopal Church, during its 76th General Convention, meeting in Anaheim, California, voted to allow Bishops in the six states – including Maine – where civil marriage is legal a measure of pastoral generosity in serving the pastoral needs of same-gender couples who come to our clergy seeking to marry in our churches. In consultation with Maine clergy who represent a wide spectrum of belief, I have developed guidelines to help our clergy minister to same-gender couples when this referendum is defeated in November. Such couples will get no special treatment. They will be required to go through the same pre-marital counseling as any other couple. I believe the fear that same gender marriage will in some way undermine other marriages or damage society is unfounded. To the contrary, same gender marriage will encourage all of us to work together to strengthen long held commitments to monogamy and faithfulness in relationships.

Our tagline of many years, The Episcopal Church Welcomes You, has never seemed more important. I hope and pray the welcome and pastoral care that same-gender couples receive in many of the Episcopal congregations across Maine will open doors to renewed participation in the lives of our congregations and communities.

Maine Episcopal clergy members, the Rev. Mary Ann Hoy (in red), the Rev. Tim Higgins (in front of her), and Bishop Steve. Dean Ben Shambaugh is blocked by the minister in the left foreground.
Maine Episcopal clergy members, the Rev. Mary Ann Hoy (in red), the Rev. Tim Higgins (in front of her), and Bishop Steve. Dean Ben Shambaugh is blocked by the minister in the left foreground.
Bishop Steve with the tv cameras and MPBN
Bishop Steve with the tv cameras and MPBN


One year in Maine: God is blessing our life and work together

Without much fanfare, my first anniversary in the diocese has come and gone. The time since my consecration on May 3, 2008 and now has marked a very good year, and Gretchen and I feel increasingly at home among you.

People often ask how I like my work or how we’re adjusting to Maine, so I thought a few reflections might be in order.

We continue to be very happy to be in Maine. We are continually discovering and rediscovering the beauty of Maine and the beauty of Maine’s people. Our churches are lively and, for the most part, happy. And even the recession has not dampened our enthusiasm for ministry. Gretchen and I love our home and are busy putting in new flower beds and a vegetable garden.

While I love the work of a bishop, the visitations are a special joy – although I miss not hearing our clergy preach. We have been warmly welcomed everywhere. Meeting with you and with your leadership never fails to deepen my appreciation for the challenges we’re facing and the creativity of our responses.

I have learned that a large part of a bishop’s job is just showing up. That leads to a very challenging schedule. Managing the schedule and the pace of my work is perhaps my greatest ongoing challenge. Saying “no” to requests for my presence is never easy.

Communication is a challenge as well. The diocese was well-adapted to the style of my predecessor. Every little change has a ripple affect. I’m learning whom I need to copy on correspondence, who needs to be informed of routine decisions, what groups need to be consulted, etc., etc. I haven’t dropped too many balls, but there have been some, and the learning can be painful.

New bishops are warned not to take too much on. I thought I was paying attention to that rubric, but I’ve taken on too much anyway. I’ve already agreed to do things that I haven’t been able to produce. And the recession, the state legislation on civil marriage, and the development needs of our congregations have all brought urgent demands. I’m trying to find the balance between thoughtful and timely responses, but that is clearly a work-in-progress. I’m deeply grateful for the dedication and hard work of my Canons, my Executive Assistant, and the Loring House staff who do a lot of heavy lifting for our diocese and for me.

It’s been a good year. The learning curve is steep, but considered all together, I am deeply grateful to God and to you for the call to this ministry. I’m having fun. I’m confident God will bless our life and work together.

Bishop Lane’s Christmas Eve Sermon

Sermon preached by the Rt. Rev.  Stephen T. Lane
Cathedral of St. Luke, Portland, Maine
December 24, 2008

Isaiah 62:6-12; Psalm 97; Titus 3:4-7; Luke 2:1-20

It’s been many years since we celebrated Christmas in a time of want. We’ve watched the perennial favorite, A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens, but without any real sense that it was about our times. Oh, we know that it’s about the right ordering of values and relationships, yet few of us have known a time when “business,” as Scrooge called it, has caused so much suffering for the innocent.

But perhaps this year, we have a greater understanding. We’ve witnessed an unprecedented reversal of our economic fortunes over the past six months; not as significant as the Great Depression, but significant enough to cause all of us great anxiety. Will business – the mortgage industry, the hedge funds, the credit markets – cause us to lose our jobs, our homes, or our retirement? What will happen to our years of investments in 401k’s? Will we have to keep working beyond the years we planned to work? Has the good life slipped beyond our grasp?

If we’re honest, we’ll also admit that we’re not simply victims. Many of us benefitted from the inflated expectations of the last two decades. We were happy to see our housing values rise. We were happy to take advantage of cheap credit, even, to live beyond our means. We were happy to think that we, too, might be rich. If business did us in, well, perhaps we’re guilty of some collusion. We all hoped that the bubble would never burst.

As Scrooge learned, we know that life is more than business and that, even in the best of times, some people are left out. We know that a price was being paid for our prosperity, a price paid by poor workers in other lands, by declining wages in our own country, by the suffering air and water of our planet, by generations yet unborn who will be saddled with our debt.

Moreover, we know that the strain of maintaining our prosperity was hurting our relationships. It was creating sharp divisions between the haves and have-nots. We were becoming suspicious of those who were not successful or of those who wanted a share of what we had. We were becoming suspicious of one another and our motives. There is genuine bad blood between some proponents of red and blue. Prosperity was putting a hard shell on our compassion causing us to turn off our fellow-feeling for them, whoever “them” might be.

But now the shades have visited us. Now the bubble has burst. Now we know that there is no dividing line between them and us. The poor are simply fellow pilgrims on the road, trying to get from here to there. Our own needs have given us a sharper sense of what others need. Perhaps now compassion can be reborn, can expand outward to encompass all those we meet.

What better story for a time like this than the story we read tonight? What story is more relevant for our times, more relevant to our needs? A poor homeless couple looking for a safe place to spend the night. A birth in poverty among the farm animals. An intimate family celebration shared only by poor shepherds watching the night sky with their flocks. And in these unseen and unremarkable events, the story of creation’s renewal, the story of the cosmos’ rebirth – God born to us, the son of God given to us. Immanuel. In God’s birth, our lives are joined with heaven, blessed, and given back.

You know the interesting thing about the birth of Jesus is that the birth is contagious. Mary was the first theo-tokas, the god-bearer. She it was who was visited by Gabriel, who conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit, who told her husband of the unexpected pregnancy, who visited her cousin Elizabeth in her pregnancy, who journeyed her slow, clumsy way to Bethlehem, who gave birth to her first born son in a feeding trough and named him Jesus. And yet, the child born to Mary was then born in the loving heart of her husband Joseph, who claimed him as his own.

The shepherds witnessed the fireworks in heaven and heard the voices of angels and went to see what the fuss was all about. And the child was born in their hearts, and they went on their way rejoicing.

Then the kings. They saw the light. They came, they saw and were conquered. And then the disciples. And then us. By baptism we bear the light of Christ. By baptism we carry Christ into the world. And every year we come here to witness the birth, to hear again the sound angels, to see the light in the darkness, and to carry it home.

Times like these can make people cynical. That’s business, we might say, let me get my piece. Or we might despair, saying that good life has been snuffed out, believing that all is vanity and a chasing after wind. But our purpose tonight is not to celebrate the good life. It’s to celebrate hope, and hope has never been related to the state of economy. Hope comes from our God who has never abandoned us; our God who seeks after us and finds us, our God who is born among us. Like the people of Israel we are a city sought out, a city not forsaken. In all times, whether ancient Israel’s, Dickens’, or our own, God comes to us and gives himself to us and invites us to bear his good news.

And unlike dear old St. Nick, God isn’t concerned about whether we’ve been naughty or nice. God hasn’t come only for Tiny Tim. God’s come for Scrooge as well. And he’s come to tell us that whatever the state of business, we are not forsaken. “Unto you is born this day a savior, who is Christ the Lord.”

As Scrooge discovered, true joy comes not from prosperity, but from sharing what we have with others. Like you, I pray for better times. I hope that next Christmas we’ll be less worried about the things that trouble our hearts tonight. But more than that, I pray for a rebirth of compassion among us. I hope our celebration of Jesus’ birth will remind us how much God loves us. I hope our hearts will burst with God’s love and that we will carry that love from this place back to our homes and back to all the places where we live and move. I hope that the contagion of Jesus’ birth will continue, that he will be born in our hearts, and that we will bear him to the world.

May it be so. Amen.

A Christmas Message from Bishop Stephen T. Lane


To the Saints and Angels in the Diocese of Maine:

We, in the Episcopal Church, celebrate our worship through a series of sacraments. That means in worship we celebrate and break open for one another the truth of God’s relationship with us.

The fundamental truth we celebrate is that God is with us. God is always with us. This annual season of Advent to Christmas is our yearly reminder that God is with us. At Christmas God joins us in the flesh. God knows our lives. God understands our circumstances. God experiences our joys and our sorrows. God is present with us to help us in our lives.

These are difficult days. There’s war. There’s recession. There’s global warming. There’s lot’s to worry about. But in the midst of all of that, we know that God is with us and, being comforted by that truth, being strengthened by that reality, we are then empowered to go and serve others.

This is a time when we remember especially the poor, the lonely, the homeless. This is a time when we open our hearts and our pocket books. This is a time when, even as we struggle, we know we are loved and blessed.

May this annual celebration be a comfort to you and, in the strength of that Good News, may you reach out to serve others.

All of us here at Loring House – the staff, Gretchen and I – wish you a very joyous and peaceful Christmas.

Bishop Stephen